Thursday, November 8, 2007

A Little Something for the Guy Who Found Me by Googling "Erwin Schrott Pictures"


B&c called me into his computer room last night to show me the above picture. You can actually tell that Erwin has a package from it. It's not that impressive a package, but we all know that I don't care about cock size.

Still, in the extremely unlikely event that he ever sings the title role in Salome, you can bet I'll be there with box seats and binoculars.

The Plot Thins


Have you noticed, readers, the inverse relationship between the amount of work I have to put into writing a post and the hotness and quantity of the pictures I post to go with? You should thank my Southern Baptist upbringing for my finely refined sense of guilt. Anyway, I saw something I had to post today, and I'm sorry. I realize that apologizing in advance for lameness accentuates rather than ameliorates the lameness, but I can't help that, either. I only wish a lot of other people would realize the same thing, but let him among us who is without sin cast the first stone, and given that I -- inadvertently, I hasten to add -- actually used the greengrocer's plural (oh, the shame!) in a comment on somebody's blog yesterday, I am in no position to cast that stone. I did have the good form to be almost literally mortified, at least.
Anyway, you know that guy from yesterday's post? Apparently, he's a) mad as hell and not going to take it any more, or b) has compatriots:

Stop stealing my underpants - m4m - 27

----------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-472137971@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-11-07, 7:35PM EST

C'mon guys, cut it out! I know they're cute, but they're expensive. After the third time now, I won't make the mistake of leaving my fresh pair out while showering.

Location: Results - U St

I'm not sure what to make of this post. He has the same age and complaint as the guy yesterday, but his location is more specific and not compatible with yesterday's location. I don't think people live in NoVA and work out at Results, but what do I know about the workout habits of the young urban gay male? Not a lot.
I can think of a few possible explanations:
1. The guy got the location wrong yesterday or works out at Results after work and before heading back to NoVA.

2. There's an underwear theft ring operating in the greater DC area and preying on 27 year olds. Thank God Maryland is safe! For now. (Is there a punctuation mark to indicate an ominous tone? Pretend that there is and I just used it, ok?)

3. Someone is putting us on. Perhaps there's a ring of perpetrators of insurance fraud. I understand fashionable underwear is quite the expensive item these days.
(At some point, you'll stop believing me when I say that I don't have an underwear fetish. I will admit to liking men in underwear. I like the way they look in it. I like taking it off them. I like playing with them when they're still in it. Still and all, my very favorite way for a guy to be dressed is in jeans with no underwear. But it's kind of like having to choose between the double chocolate and the strawberry ice cream. Either way, it's still ice cream.)
Whatever's going on here, surely there's some element of #3 included. He's had his underwear stolen three times and he's just now learning? I think not. I understand that twenty-something gymrats are often considered not the brightest people in the world, but I think that stereotype is largely perpetuated by people who are jealous of twenty-something gymrats. In any case, most of the cute gay guys I know are far too attached to their underwear to leave it out where it can be stolen, unless they want it to be stolen.
So maybe he's not complaining so much as he is advertising. Stop by the Results on U Street and claim your free pair of underwear today! I have always said that if you can imagine a sexual variation, there's someone who practices it, and the idea that someone might get off on someone else stealing his underwear is downright vanilla compared to, say, figging. (The link is pretty much safe for work, but you may be sorry if you read too much of the text.)

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

A Reasonable Request?


From today's missed connections on craigslist.

I want my shorts back... - m4m - 27

------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-471162426@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-11-06, 8:56PM EST

You know who you are.

Location: NOVA

I think that the "Location: NOVA" here is wholly superfluous. Where else would someone posting an ad like that be from? I will give him credit for conciseness, though.

As for the substance, I have never been a collector of other men's underwear, but it's a common enough hobby among gay men. Let's face it: if we put notches on our bedposts, we might as well just ask a horde of termites over for lunch. And I suppose you could blog about your hookups, but, well, how lame is that?
I'm pretty sure that if you leave a guy's house without your shorts, he's entitled to add them to his collection. If it's not the law, it should be. On moral and ethical grounds, certainly, the request for a return of the shorts has no merit.

I'm not entirely without sympathy for the poster here. I can think of two particular pairs of boxers that I'd really hate to lose. They're extremely comfortable, and the manufacturer is no more, so they're not replaceable. And they're really great for hooking up in because they look good, feel good, and allow easy access to the good(s).
Ultimately, though, I'm trying to imagine a scenario where this guy unknowingly left the other guy's place without his own shorts that doesn't make him look like an idiot. And I'm coming up blank. Maybe his shorts were kidnapped by aliens, but aliens a) never return shorts and b) don't read missed connections. The lack of logic makes their giant heads explode.

So I'm going to go with wishing this guy the best of luck, but figuring that he's not likely to see those shorts again.

Let that be a lesson to you.
Of course, those shorts might shag their way to another, another, and yet another guy, so his best bet is to stop complaining and start sleeping with as many shorts-wearing men as he can find.

Let that be a lesson to you, too.

Anyway, if you see a lot of m4m craigslist ads from a guy with a very particular underwear fetish, you'll know why.

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

A View from the Bridge


It seems almost cruel, readers. The morning after I've suffered through 2.5 hours of some of the dreariest opera ever (and believe me that's saying something), I come here and whinge about it. They say that misery loves company, but surely my own misery will not be attenuated simply because I make you miserable. What can I say? Sucks to be you. (I apologize in advance for using "dreary" so frequently, but it could not be helped.)

On the other hand, I have included some pretty pictures, beginning with a picture of the thoroughly delicious (I don't know from personal experience, but I have to assume that's literally true: is there any part of him you wouldn't bite into?) Christopher Meloni playing Eddie Carbone in the stage version of A View from the Bridge, by Arthur Miller. Unfortunately, neither Mr. Meloni nor any other thoroughly delicious thing was in evidence last night, when I sat through the operatic version of A View from the Bridge at the Kennedy Center, but I'll get back to that momentarily. First, some eye candy.
I sometimes have trouble remembering the names of things (and people: I spent a day and a half in Italy trying to remember Helen Mirren's name; in case you're wondering, it's "Helen Mirren"), so when b&c mentioned that we were going to see AVftB, I had a sense that I might have seen a student production of it at MIT. When I got my program last night and read the plot summary, it all came vividly back to me. Slightly more than twenty years ago, I went to the Kresge Little Theater at MIT and saw the MIT Shakespeare Ensemble put on a stunning production of the play. I still remember a great many images and sequences from that production. I don't even know whether the Shakespeare Ensemble (or, indeed, the Kresge Little Theater) still exists, but back then, they were a kick-ass ensemble, and I saw them do very well a lot of Shakespeare and a few other things, including the Miller.

I was thinking back over that performance last night before the curtain, and I couldn't help wondering why anyone would want to make it into an opera. Then I read some of the program notes from the composer, William Bolcom, who said that he had initially wondered the same thing before finding the earlier version of the play and becoming convinced that it needed an operatic treatment. He should have gone with his initial impulse. Time for more eye candy.
It's not that the story in AVftB is poorly suited for opera: it's extremely well suited for opera. The problem is more that, as b&c says, "people have got to stop writing music for words and get back to writing words for music." Bolcom started with the earliest version of the play as the basis for the libretto and then composed to it. The result is a whole lotta recitative sung to unpleasant music. Every time either of the sopranos sings a piece of dialog, Bolcom has her go up to really high notes on words that really don't seem to call for a higher pitch. I can only assume that he knew I'd be having trouble staying awake. It worked: no one could sleep through that. The recitative is interrupted by the occasional song, but with the exception of the first act tenor aria, the songs are unrelentingly dreary. The dreariest of these is "A Ship Called Hunger," the second act bass baritone aria. Bolcom apparently through that in because the second act -- much more tightly paced and dramatic than the lugubrious first act -- had actually generated a lot of momentum, and he needed to bring it to a standstill. The unfortunate (and kind of cute) bass baritone singing Marco is forced to sound like a shovel scraping across a bed of gravel. When we were walking out of the theater, I was quite worked up about that aria. I believe I called Mr. Bolcom a "tenor-loving queer basher." I am sick, sick, sick to death of gravelly bass arias. Mozart wrote good bass arias. Gershwin wrote good bass arias. Jerome Kern wrote "Old Man River." It can be done. So why does anyone want to take the beautiful bass or bass baritone voice and make it sound like you're killing a grizzly bear with a belt sander? Damn. I need another picture of a scantily clad hottie.
Anyway, b&c may be correct that AVftB is rife for a good operatic treatment, but as I said to him last night, "Right. Because except for the music and the libretto, this one was really great!" And the singers (pity them) were all in good voice. They just had so little to work with. As just one more example, at the beginning of the second act, there are four drunken longshoremen hanging out near the docks. They start to sing, and I thought, "Oh, good, he's going to have some fun with a male quartet." I thought we might get something reminiscent of either madrigals or doo wop, but no such luck. It was yet another minute of tedium. Sort of like doo wop without any of the fun or interesting harmonies.

Worst of all, last night's production (I think it was more the opera than the performance), failed to generate any sympathy at all for its lead character. I'm pretty sure that when I saw the play on stage, I felt both pity and terror, but last night, Eddie Carbone was little more than a douchebag. The staging, in particular, made him look a lot like Archie Bunker, but without any of Archie's lovable parts. Alas. More eye candy.

Anyway, for a story with so much textual and subtextual sexuality, there was precious little sexiness in the production. On the drive home, I was whinging about that to b&c:
Ted: God. You know what that production needed? It needed Erwin Schrott in a jockstrap.
B&c: You mean tonight's performance or the Don Giovanni last week?
Ted: Dude. Can you think of any opera that wouldn't benefit from Erwin Schrott in a jockstrap? Hell, he's a bass. Let him play Zoroaster. In a jockstrap.
B&c: I'm not sure even Erwin could have saved this performance. Would you want to put him through "A Ship Called Hunger"?
Ted: I was thinking more of just having him walk around the stage. At least I'd have been distracted.

Anyway, let's give praise where it's due. Despite the snail pacing of the first act, we were out of the theater and back in the car by 10. Even after having to stop back by my office to pick up my car, I was home by 11, so there was plenty of opportunity for horizontal quality time with b&c. It turns out that an anger fuck is just as hot when you're angry at some random composer as it is when you're angry at the guy you're fucking.

Monday, November 5, 2007

Two


[N.B.: I didn't take these pictures. I found them on the Internet.]

I stayed up way too late Thursday night, and it's a slow time at work, so I called in sick Friday. I told them I was going to spend the day in bed.

I wasn't having the best of luck. B&c had left Thursday morning to visit his mother in NJ, but I hadn't planned ahead because he kept changing his mind about whether and when he was going. I had choir practice Thursday night, and when you live as far out of the city as I do, it's pretty tough to arrange hookups on a Thursday night at 10:30. I tried placing an ad on craigslist, but I mostly got responses from idiots in Northern Virginia. Sure, bud, drive over an hour late on a Thursday night when you have to be at work at 8 am on Friday. You wanna rethink that? Yeah, I thought so.

One of those NoVA idiots told me that it was too late but that he'd be free Friday afternoon. I gave him my number, and we talked on the phone for a while, and he said he was working until noon on Friday and then he'd call me and come over. He seemed eager and very compatible, but after we got off the phone, I did a search on his email address and realized that he'd answered about eight of my ads over the last three years and had never followed through. Even though this was the first time we'd talked on the phone, I wrote him off.

I slept until about 10 on Friday and then logged on to squirt, where I found a bondage sub who wanted to be tied up at noon. He said he didn't kiss "on the first date," but as much as I love kissing, I can get by without it with a bondage sub. (It's really, really hot, though, when you start making out with a guy who's tied up, especially after you've been spanking him or doing some intense nipple play.) And his ass looked pretty good in his pictures, so I figured I'd give it a go.
Can we talk for a minute about the limitations of metaphor? I was about to say that you shouldn't do your grocery shopping on an empty stomach, and you shouldn't arrange your hookups when you're horny because either way you end up with things you shouldn't have. But that doesn't make any sense at all. I suppose you could jerk off before arranging a hookup, but I suspect that would be counterproductive. If hooking up is going to be grocery shopping, then you pretty much have to do it on an empty stomach. But you don't have to be starving. I hadn't done a non-threeway hookup in a very long while (by my standards, anyway), and my judgment was clouded, so when the guy showed up late and said, "I want to discuss some ground rules first" and then (after I had led him by the nipple to the couch) followed up with "nothing goes in my mouth," I should have sent him away. Not kissing is one thing (and even though our heads were a couple of feet apart, I could tell his breath was crap), but no oral? Alas, I was already hard from tweaking his nipple, so I just pushed his ass up the stairs.

He started to undress, and I told him not to. He was, within the bounds he'd laid out, very submissive, so he stopped, and I shoved him on the bed and started to work on his nipples. He'd asked me earlier not to bite, so I didn't: I used my lips and tongue on one nip, and I grasped the other firmly between thumb and forefinger. I had him moaning pretty quickly, but he didn't really get into it until I took off his t-shirt and put the wrist restraints on him. I tied his wrists to the top corners of the bed, straddled him, and started to twist both nipples forcefully. I alternated with feather light touch over his nipples, along his arms, down his sides and across his stomach, all of which made him convulse. He told me that he really liked my touch, so I put the blindfold on him, which made him stop talking and start breathing quickly and shaking, a big improvement.

I unbuttoned and unzipped his jeans, leaving them on but open. I lay next to him and started sucking and tonguing his right nipple while I ran my index finger over his briefs. He was getting louder and louder, and I really didn't feel much of a need to change anything. Making out with a great kisser is probably at the top of my list, but next to that, working the nipple of a guy who's tied to the bed is really one of my favorite things. In general, I'd prefer to bite and work it harder, but working it intensely without teeth also has a very strong appeal.

When I felt the need to reposition myself, I pulled his jeans off and took off my clothes. I straddled his thighs again, and rubbed my cock against his briefs. I grabbed both pecs in my hands and squeezed, and he got more excited. There was a nice precum spot on the front of his briefs. I knelt on the side of the bed and let him fondle my cock with one of his hands (a bit awkward given how they were bound). Then I slid my hand through the fly of his briefs and started to play with his nuts and finger his ass. He'd seemed all along to be having a pretty great time, but when I touched his ass, he definitely went to another level. So I took off his briefs and went for the lube and toys.
I was having a good time during all of this, but I was never anything like carried away. I was extremely hard, but I wasn't feeling much like fucking the guy, especially after I sunk a couple of lubed fingers up his ass and then needed to wash my hands. He'd clearly cleaned out some, but he hadn't done a thorough job. I pushed a (relatively) thick buttplug into his ass and wedged it against the bed so that he couldn't push it out while I washed my hands.

I sucked on his nipple yet again and played with his nuts for a while, and he shuddered and moaned at increasing levels. He kept pushing his leg up against my cock. I was really hard and having a great time even though I was still a little pissed off about his particular limits. Eventually, he pushed the plug out, and I tossed it in the sink, and then I ignored his ass completely. I kept sucking more and more intently on his nipple, and he would turn his lower body (only his arms were tied) and push his ass towards my cock. I'd let them just barely touch and then I'd back away.

I had him to the point of climax pretty quickly, but while part of me wanted to finish him off and send him on his way, a slightly larger part of me wanted to tease him for a good while, so I stopped stroking him, and he told me that I was really pushing his buttons. I gather that was a good thing.

I spent the next forty-five minutes or so bringing him close and backing off, working his nipple all the while. By the time I was finally ready to get him off, there was a big red ring all around his nip, and he was telling me that I was a real sadist. I don't think I am, but then I've always found it hard to feel like a sadist when the other guy is so obviously having a terrific time. And I wasn't biting him, after all.
We'd been at it for just a bit under two hours when I got him close and didn't stop. He was jerking very convincingly, and as soon as the first squirt of cum came, I squeezed his cock very tightly, hoping to make the next squirt fly farther. It didn't work, but it did get him very worked up and made his cock very sensitive, so that when he'd finished his load and I kept stroking him, he began to whimper and finally begged me to stop. Which I did, of course. I wiped him up with a towel, removed the blindfold, and untied him, and while he went and showered, I untied the ropes from the corners of the bed and put the sex toys either back in the toolbox or in hot soapy water, as appropriate. After some mercifully brief inane conversation, he was gone. I considered looking for someone else, but I wasn't sure I wanted to, and then I got a call from the ex saying that I should probably take YFU for the weekend to balance out the custody schedule, which meant that there wasn't time to look, even if I'd had the inclination.

I put on some porn to jerk off to. I was intent on lasting as long as I could, but I couldn't last that long, and only fifteen minutes later, I had a fairly spectacular -- and very messy -- orgasm. The pillowcases had needed laundering anyway.

The disconcerting thing about the whole hookup was that it seemed to be more about power than about sex. It might seem like that's always the case with bondage, but it isn't. It wasn't the bondage part where the power played out. It was his refusal to give oral and my subsequent refusal to fuck him. As if we each had to withhold something to maintain the balance of power. It seems odd that I would feel like I'm preserving my power by denying my own pleasure, but I legitimately didn't want to fuck him, and it's pretty clear to me that I got a lot more physical pleasure from jerking off than I would have gotten from blowing a load in a condom in his ass. Clearly I'm thinking about this more than is merited, and in future, I'll just choose more wisely.

And not go so long between extracurricular fucks, but sometimes that's easier said than done, even in an open relationship.

Sunday, November 4, 2007

Three


I was sitting at my desk, minding my own business, earlier this week when my cell phone rang. The caller id said it was b&c. On the one hand, I figured I should answer it because he's my partner. On the other hand, since he only works as a consultant these days, he's got a lot of time on his hands, and sometimes he calls without a good reason: "Hey, you remember that pumpkin carving set that you couldn't find Sunday? I found it!" Which usually elicits something like, "Great. Why don't you put it away again so that we can have this exact same conversation a year from now when you've forgotten again where you put it?"

I've been experiencing a fair amount of deja vu lately. Like on Sunday night, when I was carving my pumpkins with the inferior but inexpensive replacement pumpkin knife that I'd had to go out and find at the last minute when b&c couldn't remember where he'd hidden stored the one I bought the year before, and b&c came into the dining room and told me that he'd read that eating too many fresh vegetables might be giving him gas. I'm fairly certain that he tells me about the relationship between broccoli and intestinal gas every time I'm sitting at the dining room table carving a pumpkin. Or at least one other time when I was engaged in that activity at that location. Still, it's not like I carve pumpkins every night, so it was strange enough to make an impression. I tried to ignore the whole situation because a) talking about gas: ewwww and b) if I'm stuck in a chronic hysteresis, I really don't want to know about it. Would you?

Anyway, there I was at my desk, and I figured: what the hell, I'll answer the phone. What's the worst that can happen? The last time I answered one of b&c's calls, I'd ended up at the opera later that same day, and while that's only about 35% likely to be a good thing, in this case, I ended up scrutinizing the delicious voice and torso of Erwin Schrott.

Alas, no Erwin Schrott-related events were mentioned in this phone call, but b&c did say that his friend Kip had texted b&c to see whether we wanted to do a threeway that evening. I was, naturally, exhausted from being out very late at the opera the night before, but it is not in my nature to turn down a threeway where one of the other two guys is a Filipino nurse. Even when the third guy is b&c.

B&c's and my history with threeways has not been as smooth as, say, Kip's body. In general, my feeling about threeways is that I'd rather do them with two guys who don't know each other or, preferably, with an established couple. That way, I'm the fresh meat, so I get all the attention. In our particular case, b&c wrestles with jealousy or some feeling of exclusion. I'm not entirely sure exactly how much of each is involved, but when he and I do a threeway together, it's often because somebody that he's been playing with wants a top involved. In the past, he would occasionally agree to or arrange a threeway and then sort of back out at the last minute, saying something like "You two go ahead and play," or he'd go out for a walk just before the third man was scheduled to arrive. Then I'd play with the other guy for a while and I'd yell downstairs for him to come and play, and he'd join us eventually. It was immature and a little annoying. Fortunately, he's gotten past that, though nowadays he sometimes sort of withdraws without leaving the bed.

If there are three of us on the bed, and b&c hangs back, then I just play with the other guy. I figure that everyone is responsible for his own pleasure in bed, and if b&c wants to pseudo-sulk, then I shouldn't reward him by coaxing. I reckon that sounds a bit harsh, but there is no reason to reinforce bad behavior. Once about three years ago, I asked b&c how his day had been, and he took that as an opening to rant at me about some imagined misbehavior on my part. So I just didn't ask him how his day was for another four or five months. I didn't want to be bitten twice.

Anyway. I got home around 7:30 that evening and headed for the shower. Kip arrived shortly after eight, having stopped by his place to shower after having worked a twelve-hour shift. It was his fourth consecutive day working a twelve-hour shift, so he was a little tired, but he seemed to perk up when he got to the bedroom. I was lying on the bed in my black boxers, and I moved to the side of the bed where he was standing and started to remove his jeans. I put my hands up under his t-shirt and stroked his nipples, then pulled him down to kiss him. After a minute, he pulled back and said something about how he hoped he wasn't being a tease, so I stood up, grabbed him, picked him up, threw him on the bed (he's really very slight), straddled him, held down his wrists, and said, "Don't worry. If you tease, I'll just take what I want." Kip responds well to authority. I started to kiss him again and worked on his nipples some more with my hands. B&c was still getting undressed.
I took Kip's shirt off and began working his nipples with my mouth, and he started to moan more. He was wearing just a jockstrap now, and while I was chewing on one nip, I was alternately squeezing one ass cheek and spanking the other. He seemed to approve. After a bit, he tried to pull his jockstrap down, but I pulled it back up, put his hand above my head, turned him on his side, and dove for his ass.

He and b&c made out a bit while I ate Kip's ass. He really loves having it eaten, so he was writhing a bit. I started to play with b&c's cock. It was really nice and hard, so I rolled Kip onto his other side and guided b&c's rod towards Kip's ass. B&c poked around the outside of his hole for a while, and I went back to kissing Kip and tugging on his nipples.

B&c didn't have any real interest in fucking Kip, so he moved around so that he could go down on me while Kip and I kept making out. He was doing a great job on my cock, too. Kip tried again to get his jock down, but I again stopped him. Then I moved a finger to his ass. He started to writhe some more, even though I was only fingering the outside of his hole. When I did that, he moved further up the bed. I'm a lot taller than him, so there was now pretty much unfettered access to my cock, and b&c took the opportunity to lube himself up and sit on me. It was great. Kip had moved far enough up so that I could eat his ass and play with his nipples while b&c bounced up and down on my rod. I could do that all day.

My neck was in a bit of an awkward position, though, so when b&c decided to take a break from riding me, I repositioned Kip so that I could kiss him and push my cockhead between his thighs. He tightened them, and I thrusted. Then he loosened them but kept kissing me. I moved to his nipples for an extended period and kind of lost track of everything else, but when I started paying attention again, I found that b&c (or perhaps Kip, but probably not) had removed Kip's jockstrap and was starting to go down on him. I was a bit put out by this because I figured (rightly, as it turned out), that b&c had just eliminated any chance I had at topping Kip. If you treat a bottom like a sub, he'll pretty much do what you want, assuming he also wants it (and Kip pretty clearly wants to be fucked, but he has some major physiological and psychological hurdles to clear first). But if you start to treat him like a top, then he starts to act like one. I went back to eating his ass again, but when I got my cock back near his ass, he told me it was too painful, even though I hadn't entered him and he had poppers.

Anyway, after a while, b&c went to the bathroom for a bit, and Kip kept trying to fuck my face. Ordinarily, I'd have gone with that because his cock is so small I can easily handle its so-called thrusting, but I figured my best bet was to pin him down, shove a finger in his ass, and suck him off. He took a hit of poppers, and then he loved the way I was hitting his prostate. I didn't have to suck him for long before he started to cum. Tiny cock: huge load.
As soon as he came, kip was good for nothing. He apologized and said he was too tired to help out much, which, given his work schedule, was reasonable. And we had been going at it for ninety minutes. I played with b&c's nipples for a while, and he finished himself off by hand. Long cock: tiny load. Then I quickly finished myself. Thick cock, humongous load. B&c went downstairs to finish dinner, and Kip and I chatted idly while he cleaned up and left. B&c and I ended up having dinner at 10:30.

I'm not sure whether there'll be another threeway with Kip. Hes cute and fun, but he's not as good a kisser as he should be, and he's a bit of a tease. He is, he says, in a monogamous relationship now, but he's had two threeways with us (and has gotten other blowjobs from b&c) while he's been in this relationship. I reckon his definition of monogamy is somewhat more metaphorical than my own, but whatever. If there is another threeway, I'll have to have a discussion with b&c first so that I finally get to fuck that exceptional ass. I'd rather do kip one on one so that I could put him in the restraints and make him beg for my cock up his ass, but I think there may never be an opportunity.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Miserere Nobis


I don't want to sound alarmist, but things are getting out of hand. I might go so far as to call it a crisis: a crisis of imagination. I'm writing, of course, about the m2m personals in the local craigslist. Back in the day, you never had to look very far for the ads that had the repulsive allure of a trainwreck. Nowadays, it's pretty dull.

Still, if you try, you can find something moderately amusing:

ur blk jezus looking for rough racial sex - 25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-465127663@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-10-31, 2:04PM EDT

looking for white guys that will let me whip them and 'rape' them to give payback for the slavery my black ancestors went through. looking for safe kinky fun and looking for now or later in aaco.
Sexual reparations (especially the whipping and bottoming part) are not so much my thing, but even if they were, I'd have to give the guy a pass because of the scare quotes. Still, I'd guess that he'll get some response. Maybe from this guy:

White Mouth for Use By Black Guys Saturday Night - 45

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-465217202@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-10-31, 3:34PM EDT

White Mouth for Use By Black Guys Saturday Night....White cocksucker looking to provide total uninhibited service to a group of black men this coming Saturday night, November 3. Sucking, fucking, rimming, w/s, few limits. Looking for a group of 4 to 6 black guys. Beer, poppers cool. I'm in shape, 5ft 9in, 175lbs, short military cut dark hair.
I've said (many times) before that I don't understand racial fetishization. I'm much more of a black-or-yellow-red-or-white-they-are-precious-in-his-sight kind of guy. But you can't help what you like, right? These two ads don't match up perfectly, but I reckon the two of them could negotiate an encounter that would please both of them. It's all about being flexible.

I don't have much of an opinion on the reparations movement. I think reparations are justified, but implementing them seems logistically difficult and politically impossible. And I have my doubts that the reparations movement wants to give up its claims in exchange for an evening of unlubricated buttsex. Still, if you're going to make up for hundreds of years of oppression with a single fuck, well, that's gonna be some fuck. I don't get the whole "ur blk jezus" thing, though. Isn't this scenario really asking for the bottom to be the sacrificial lamb and to take on the weight of his race's wrongdoings? I hate it when people don't consider their analogies carefully enough. Still, given the likely intensity and the symbolism, I feel like I should volunteer to observe the session and sing an "Agnus Dei" while it's going on.

(Even further aside than usual: why are masses and other ecclesiastical music so rare in porn soundtracks? They'd be a huge improvement over the usual repetitive electronic crap they play. The next time a bottom is riding me, I think I'll try singing the "Libera Me" from the Faure Requiem and see how it goes over. Potential downside: I know the baritone solo by heart, but getting a choir in the bedroom to do the choral parts could be tricky. Maybe I should just sing the "Pie Jesu" down an octave and a fourth instead, but the "Libera Me" is really better suited for anal. You don't really want the bottom to be thinking about everlasting rest. When did sex get to be so complicated?)


Will I lose all of my slut cred if I admit that I've never been to the Crew Club (the local sex club in DC) or any sex club? I'm not good at performing in public, and why go to the livestock auction when you can order up exactly what you want on the Internet? Still, I can see the attraction. But if you're going for random, anonymous sex, don't you lose part of the experience when you try to arrange it in advance? For instance:

Halloween night at Crew Club? - 38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-465201822@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-10-31, 3:19PM EDT

I don't want to be at home this evening, dealing with the bratty little trick-or-treaters (<-- not that I'm anti-kids, it's just that my neighborhood is full of budding gangster punks) and I'm not really up for going to the bars. So, I'm thinking of heading to Crew Club and getting my ass pumped chockful of cum. Any horny and hung white tops heading there this evening? LOVE getting fucked bareback and swallowing loads of cum in the steamroom. (Sorry, this trick-or-treater doesn't want any chocolate bars!) Let me know if you want to hook up there tonight!!
Unsafe sex at a sex club strikes me as particularly stupid, but one presumes the guy who posted the ad is positive and looking for other positive guys. I think he should be a bit more forthright about it, but how can you reason with someone who doesn't like chocolate bars. Or is that a metaphor? You see how naive I really am.


I see this next sort of ad every so often. The guys it appeals to are all over gay.com and squirt.

Married Men's Daytime Sex Group - 40

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: pers-464885865@craigslist.org
Date: 2007-10-31, 9:52AM EDT

Planning a daytime, group sex event sometime during the week. You need to be 1) discrete, 2) attractive, 3) ddf, 4)gay, bi or bi-curious, 4) open-minded, and 5) sexually adventurous.
If this sounds like you, please send pic (ok to have face darkened out), accurate stats and availability.
Because of the nature of this event, no one will be invited who has not sent a pic.... sorry about that.
Cheers!
(Okay, people, I'm only going to say this once [today]: "discrete" and "discreet" are different words with different meanings. Learn them and use them properly. I don't really give a fuck if you want to cheat on your wife, but don't cheat on your mother tongue.)

I post the above ad only to mention that some time ago I was saying to b&c that I thought it might be a good business model to get all of the married gay guys together to invest in a (very) short-term rental property. I'd sell partnership interests, and the partnership would buy a local condo and members could use it for their tricks for a small additional fee. Eventually, we'd sell the condo and the investors would get a return. (It was a better plan when the housing market was going up and up and up, but it'll be a good plan when the market's at its bottom, too.)

B&c informed me that there was already at least one such shared trysting place. I think he said it was in Bethesda, and the arrangement's very similar to what I envisioned. Apparently, the partners also have occasional sex parties. There's a small per-use charge, and there are designated partners or vendors who take care of laundry, etc. I'm glad to see that the market works sometimes.

By the way, b&c also told me that there's a group of married men who volunteer one morning a week at a local soup kitchen type of charity. Then after they've finished feeding the homeless, they go somewhere and feed each other. I'm guessing that they do this not so much out of a charitable impulse as from a need to have a good excuse to get away from their wives, but good works are good works. I just hope they wear gloves when they're doing the food prep.